If James Bond likes his martinis shaken, not stirred, then how do you suppose he prefers his full frontal nude scenes? Oh, that's right, for all you ladies at home wondering exactly how much Bond you'd actually be getting should you have a chance to shag the secret spy, all you may have to do is go watch Casino Royale.
According to Contact Music, Daniel Craig has assured his movie bosses that he has no problem taking it all off in front of the camera...and then turning around in an effort to piss off every guy that chose Royale as their first date flick. Craig explains, "I have told bosses I'm prepared to do a full frontal scene. I'm not shy and Bond wouldn't be shy about it either." Although he has a point, should audiences really see that much of Bond? Would it somehow taint the mysterious man we've all grown to love over the years? Not sure, but I will go to the theater armed with an assortment of "Nah, that's not his real one - they CGI most of it" explanations.
In other Bond news, a few new set pictures have surfaced showing Daniel Craig and Caterina Murino stepping out of an Aston Martin. While Caterina seems to be dressed in a beautiful red gown, Bond has on a sweater and khakis. What's up Craig, where's the tux?
1. Connery came awful close to full frontal once.
But wouldn't that make it an R? Bond's have always been PG or PG-13. I find it hard to believe the producers would allow them to drastically cut the gross (as it would probably do) for something as trivial as that.
Posted at 11:06PM on Mar 4th 2006 by guano